The Strongest Careers Are Non-Linear
(Note by Will: I wasn't raised this way (Hence my doctorate), having been taught that getting as much education as you can stand was the correct path to go. So, I cannot fully agree with this article. However, she has a very strong point and her logic is sound. I personally now owe $546,000 in interest on $120,000 in Federally subsidized loans... $100,000 of which I did not need for degrees I really could have done without. Moreover, these loans, which were and are my only form of debt, went into default for a year as I couldn't get employed out of school to make the money that I needed to pay them off. With all that being said, I made no wrong moves or bad choices. Such was simply the path that had to occur, which, is inadequate.)
1. Skipping college.
The real issue we have with admitting that college is not a path to the work world is then we have to ask ourselves
why we send our kids to high school. There is plenty of data to show that teens are able to manage their lives without the constraints of school. The book
Escaping the Endless Adolescence is chock full of data, and
a recent article by my favorite journalist, Jennifer Senior, shows that high school is not just unnecessary, but actually damaging to teens who need much more freedom to grow than high school affords.
2. Focus on internships instead of school.
Kids should be working in
internships in high school. Because the
best path to a good job is a bunch of great internships. But great internships don’t go to people who need money. They are mostly for young people. Yes, this is probably illegal and classist and bad for a fluid society. But we will not debate that here. Instead we will debate why kids need to go to college if the
internships are what make them employable? Kids should do internships in high school and by their college years, they are capable of real jobs where they are doing work that people value, with cash.
You cannot take this route if you’re saddled with huge student loans. You can’t take this route if you’re inundated by homework in required subjects you don’t care about. You can’t take this route if you have no
work experience when you graduate college. It’s too late. (Don’t tell me you need to go to school to learn, okay?
People just do not believe this anymore.)
I was reading the Fortune list of 40 under 40 and I was struck by the career history of
Kevin Feige (number 11 on the list). He’s president of Marvel Studios at age 39. He wrote that he interned with the Superman movie director as a film student and that was the last job application he filled out. That’s because if you get an internship with someone great, and your performance is great, your network will cover your employment needs for a very long time.
3. Start a company instead of writing a resume.
I’m struck by
Marissa Mayer (number 3 on Fortune’s list) whose
announced acquisition strategy is buying small, cheap companies. Which is, in effect, buying the team. Silicon Valley calls these acqui-hires. She is looking at young people who start companies that are not necessarily successful in terms of product or sales but successfully market the founders as visionaries, self-starters, and hard workers. You can’t show those traits in school, so if you have those traits, you slow yourself down by going to school where you cannot exhibit your best, marketable traits.
4. Refuse to present yourself in a linear way.
Do any workaround that lets you forgo the linear obsession the standard resume format. Because linear presentations favor people who have long, rule-following careers –
which don’t necessarily make you look good anyway. I could write a post ten thousand paragraphs long of all the new things people with nonlinear work histories are doing to get jobs.
People use twitter as a resume, according to the Wall Street Journal, which requires only that you publish ideas, not any sort of academic experience.
Young people are
selling stock in themselves - paying out dividends for decades at a time.
Agents represent workers who pick and choose projects that match them rather than signing on for indefinite amounts of time. The Harvard Business Review calls this
supertemping. Business Week calls it
going Hollywood.
But here’s the big takeaway. A fundamental shift is taking place, where the path to getting a job is massively circumventing college credentials. And, at the same time, the
American public is fed up with the
insane debt that college are expecting new grads to take on in order to graduate. (Good essay:
How College Ruined My Life.)
If you are not going to school in order to “fit” into the adult world, then why are you going to school? The love of learning, presumably. But school reform pundits are 100% sure that kids will choose to learn if you put no constraints on them. They will just learn what they want. Best example:
The MIT program that gave iPads to illiterate kids in Ethiopia, and they taught themselves
to use it, program it, and read it in English.
No teacher. No curriculum.
The biggest barrier to accepting the radical new nature of the job hunt is the reverberations throughout the rest of life. If
you don’t need school for work, and
you don’t need school for learning, then
all you need school for is so parents can go to work and not worry about taking care of their kids.
It takes bravery to go against the grain. It’s difficult to say that the great learning and the great jobs come from leaning out, doing things in a nonlinear, non standard way, and playing only by the rules that fit your own style for personal learning and growth.
